<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The GOP&#8217;s Road to Relevance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/02/the-gops-road-to-relevance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/02/the-gops-road-to-relevance/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:33:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Redefining Prosperity &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/02/the-gops-road-to-relevance/#comment-2627</link>
		<dc:creator>Redefining Prosperity &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=1267#comment-2627</guid>
		<description>[...] of place, our priorities of localism, agrarianism, and self-government?  Both Mark and Kyle have made suggestions and laid out critiques of the Republican Party and its attempt to become relevant once again.  I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of place, our priorities of localism, agrarianism, and self-government?  Both Mark and Kyle have made suggestions and laid out critiques of the Republican Party and its attempt to become relevant once again.  I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/02/the-gops-road-to-relevance/#comment-2473</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=1267#comment-2473</guid>
		<description>E.D. - In your follow up: 

1) I hope you really flesh-out your “paleo-vision of America.” 

2) Explain your opposition to “rampant individualism that seems to have led, almost directly, the advent of the Big State as we know it.” (This seems contradictory. Or perhaps it simply requires a Big State to protect rampant individualism?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E.D. &#8211; In your follow up: </p>
<p>1) I hope you really flesh-out your “paleo-vision of America.” </p>
<p>2) Explain your opposition to “rampant individualism that seems to have led, almost directly, the advent of the Big State as we know it.” (This seems contradictory. Or perhaps it simply requires a Big State to protect rampant individualism?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.D. Kain</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/02/the-gops-road-to-relevance/#comment-2466</link>
		<dc:creator>E.D. Kain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=1267#comment-2466</guid>
		<description>I wonder.  Personally, I&#039;m torn, and will be following up on this post with my own.  I&#039;m very drawn to the paleo-vision of America.  I&#039;m very much opposed to the rampant individualism that seems to have led, almost directly, the advent of the Big State as we know it.  Then again, has taps already been played for that dream?  Have we entered an era where the State will inevitably play a major role in many, many arenas of our lives?  Ideally, nationalized health care would not be necessary.  The structure of our society would not call for it. But now?  In this landscape of detachment we&#039;ve reaped? 

But I will get carried away.  I&#039;ll save it for my post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder.  Personally, I&#8217;m torn, and will be following up on this post with my own.  I&#8217;m very drawn to the paleo-vision of America.  I&#8217;m very much opposed to the rampant individualism that seems to have led, almost directly, the advent of the Big State as we know it.  Then again, has taps already been played for that dream?  Have we entered an era where the State will inevitably play a major role in many, many arenas of our lives?  Ideally, nationalized health care would not be necessary.  The structure of our society would not call for it. But now?  In this landscape of detachment we&#8217;ve reaped? </p>
<p>But I will get carried away.  I&#8217;ll save it for my post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The GOP&#8217;s Road to Relevance</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/02/the-gops-road-to-relevance/#comment-2462</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The GOP&#8217;s Road to Relevance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=1267#comment-2462</guid>
		<description>[...] at the League of Ordinary Gentlemen.   This entry was posted on Saturday, February 28th, 2009 and is filed under Conservatism, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at the League of Ordinary Gentlemen.   This entry was posted on Saturday, February 28th, 2009 and is filed under Conservatism, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
