<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Theocon Menace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/02/the-theocon-menace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/02/the-theocon-menace/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:22:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: paul h.</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/02/the-theocon-menace/#comment-2022</link>
		<dc:creator>paul h.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=988#comment-2022</guid>
		<description>Well ... I think Linker&#039;s point was that Neuhaus et al. resist liberalism AS SUCH (Macintyre does as well, in his own way, though he doesn&#039;t bother with politics at all, instead washing his hands of the whole business), and that when you resist liberalism, what do you have left?  Linker, if I&#039;m not mistaken (and judging by his book) seems to at least hint at the idea: what you have left is something tending towards authoritarianism and fascism (see: ultra-conservative Catholics in Vichy France, Franco&#039;s Spain, etc. etc.), a top-down authoritarian theocracy.  Which is what came before liberalism, obviously (well, just before; prior to that you have the Athenian/Roman humanist pagan virtues etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8230; I think Linker&#8217;s point was that Neuhaus et al. resist liberalism AS SUCH (Macintyre does as well, in his own way, though he doesn&#8217;t bother with politics at all, instead washing his hands of the whole business), and that when you resist liberalism, what do you have left?  Linker, if I&#8217;m not mistaken (and judging by his book) seems to at least hint at the idea: what you have left is something tending towards authoritarianism and fascism (see: ultra-conservative Catholics in Vichy France, Franco&#8217;s Spain, etc. etc.), a top-down authoritarian theocracy.  Which is what came before liberalism, obviously (well, just before; prior to that you have the Athenian/Roman humanist pagan virtues etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
