<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “But who versus? Who are we doing it versus?”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/but-who-versus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/but-who-versus/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:37:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sometimes We&#8217;re Wrong &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/but-who-versus/#comment-9280</link>
		<dc:creator>Sometimes We&#8217;re Wrong &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2089#comment-9280</guid>
		<description>[...] of which is to say that you should read William Brafford on political traditions, which remains one of my favorite posts from the League to this day: I use [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of which is to say that you should read William Brafford on political traditions, which remains one of my favorite posts from the League to this day: I use [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tradition in the modern United States. &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/but-who-versus/#comment-5738</link>
		<dc:creator>Tradition in the modern United States. &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2089#comment-5738</guid>
		<description>[...] (Note: I also talked about what I mean when I talk about “tradition” in this post.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Note: I also talked about what I mean when I talk about “tradition” in this post.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a quote for saturday &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/but-who-versus/#comment-5716</link>
		<dc:creator>a quote for saturday &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2089#comment-5716</guid>
		<description>[...] Brafford, in his brilliant debut here at the League, wrote: I find myself caught between traditions, and I often wish I could commit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brafford, in his brilliant debut here at the League, wrote: I find myself caught between traditions, and I often wish I could commit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who I&#8217;m Versus &#171; Upturned Earth</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/but-who-versus/#comment-5112</link>
		<dc:creator>Who I&#8217;m Versus &#171; Upturned Earth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2089#comment-5112</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m stealing William Brafford&#8217;s introductory motif from The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m stealing William Brafford&#8217;s introductory motif from The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faith and modernity &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/but-who-versus/#comment-4500</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith and modernity &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2089#comment-4500</guid>
		<description>[...] Brafford wrote the other day: I find myself caught between traditions, and I often wish I could commit to one. In short, I find [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brafford wrote the other day: I find myself caught between traditions, and I often wish I could commit to one. In short, I find [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Limits of Secularization &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/but-who-versus/#comment-4198</link>
		<dc:creator>The Limits of Secularization &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 11:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2089#comment-4198</guid>
		<description>[...] and fragmentation of groups within a society, tradition can help sustain common culture.  And a living tradition can adopt and then preserve change in a way that the empty shell of secularization [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and fragmentation of groups within a society, tradition can help sustain common culture.  And a living tradition can adopt and then preserve change in a way that the empty shell of secularization [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Are We Doing it Versus? &#171; The Marginspace</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/but-who-versus/#comment-3993</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Are We Doing it Versus? &#171; The Marginspace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2089#comment-3993</guid>
		<description>[...] In Uncategorized on April 1, 2009 at 6:06 pm  This was an interesting passage by William Brafford on his blog at The League of Ordinary Gentlemen, the most beautiful looking blog I&#8217;ve seen in a while.  I chopped it up a little to broaden [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In Uncategorized on April 1, 2009 at 6:06 pm  This was an interesting passage by William Brafford on his blog at The League of Ordinary Gentlemen, the most beautiful looking blog I&#8217;ve seen in a while.  I chopped it up a little to broaden [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Brafford</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/but-who-versus/#comment-3901</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brafford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2089#comment-3901</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure other commentors will disagree with me here, but I have to say that, although faith can be and often is used to avoid facing difficulties and contradictions in one&#039;s way of thinking, my reading of theology has me convinced that the faithful have just as often grappled deeply and subtly with the moral, philosophical, interpretive, and plainly theological weaknesses of their predecessors. Most of the theologians we remember, we remember because they resolved or redescribed an extant problem in such a way that progress was made towards its resolution. John of Damascus, Anselm, Aquinas, Newman, Barth: these men were not ideologues. You can think the revelation from which they claimed to take their bearings was utterly (even transparently) false, but the practice of reasoning from that revelation (and, I would argue, still is) a living tradition. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m sure other commentors will disagree with me here, but I have to say that, although faith can be and often is used to avoid facing difficulties and contradictions in one&#039;s way of thinking, my reading of theology has me convinced that the faithful have just as often grappled deeply and subtly with the moral, philosophical, interpretive, and plainly theological weaknesses of their predecessors. Most of the theologians we remember, we remember because they resolved or redescribed an extant problem in such a way that progress was made towards its resolution. John of Damascus, Anselm, Aquinas, Newman, Barth: these men were not ideologues. You can think the revelation from which they claimed to take their bearings was utterly (even transparently) false, but the practice of reasoning from that revelation (and, I would argue, still is) a living tradition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tradition, Traditionalism, and Marriage &#171; Upturned Earth</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/but-who-versus/#comment-3900</link>
		<dc:creator>Tradition, Traditionalism, and Marriage &#171; Upturned Earth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2089#comment-3900</guid>
		<description>[...] is to say, as has been said quite well in recent days, that a tradition, as opposed to a mere ideology, is never something that is static, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is to say, as has been said quite well in recent days, that a tradition, as opposed to a mere ideology, is never something that is static, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle_M</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/but-who-versus/#comment-3897</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle_M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2089#comment-3897</guid>
		<description>Thanks for reading my rather complimentary semi-related response.  
 
In thinking about your post, I wonder if ideology represents a sort of permanent vacation from the uncomfortable winter of our own cognitive dissonance. If that is the case, I wonder (and ask), if the role of ideology, pejoratively used in a political sense, is meaningfully different from the role of faith, more benignly used in a spiritual/religious sense?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reading my rather complimentary semi-related response.  </p>
<p>In thinking about your post, I wonder if ideology represents a sort of permanent vacation from the uncomfortable winter of our own cognitive dissonance. If that is the case, I wonder (and ask), if the role of ideology, pejoratively used in a political sense, is meaningfully different from the role of faith, more benignly used in a spiritual/religious sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
