<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redefining Prosperity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/redefining-prosperity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/redefining-prosperity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:46:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Same Bird of Prey &#171; This Ringing Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/redefining-prosperity/#comment-10456</link>
		<dc:creator>Same Bird of Prey &#171; This Ringing Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=1291#comment-10456</guid>
		<description>[...] Bird of&#160;Prey    I know this is nothing new, but ED Kain makes some points that I&#8217;ve made myself regarding the limited differences between the Democrats and Republicans. This is the fundamental [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bird of&nbsp;Prey    I know this is nothing new, but ED Kain makes some points that I&#8217;ve made myself regarding the limited differences between the Democrats and Republicans. This is the fundamental [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/redefining-prosperity/#comment-10425</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=1291#comment-10425</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m as troubled as the next by this massive spending, but then again, massive spending has been the status quo for years.  Only, instead of spending trillions on health care reform, we’ve spent it on wars in far off lands. &quot;

Sharp. Something I&#039;ve mulled over many a time. Alleged &quot;nationalists&quot; spending money to &quot;save&quot; Iraqis when their own people suffer from plagues unassisted. Most peculiar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m as troubled as the next by this massive spending, but then again, massive spending has been the status quo for years.  Only, instead of spending trillions on health care reform, we’ve spent it on wars in far off lands. &#8221;</p>
<p>Sharp. Something I&#8217;ve mulled over many a time. Alleged &#8220;nationalists&#8221; spending money to &#8220;save&#8221; Iraqis when their own people suffer from plagues unassisted. Most peculiar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: why I am not a neoconservative &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/redefining-prosperity/#comment-10299</link>
		<dc:creator>why I am not a neoconservative &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=1291#comment-10299</guid>
		<description>[...] that be &#8211; but also recognizing the very real societal need for safety nets.  I wrote about all of that a while back here at the League.   Corporatism and statism are both dangerous, and are equal partners with equal stakes in this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that be &#8211; but also recognizing the very real societal need for safety nets.  I wrote about all of that a while back here at the League.   Corporatism and statism are both dangerous, and are equal partners with equal stakes in this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two Individualisms &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/redefining-prosperity/#comment-3437</link>
		<dc:creator>Two Individualisms &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=1291#comment-3437</guid>
		<description>[...] is the individualism I meant to critique in my original piece.  We have such a consensus on what individuality means as Americans that it becomes hard to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the individualism I meant to critique in my original piece.  We have such a consensus on what individuality means as Americans that it becomes hard to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giving Stuff Its Due &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/redefining-prosperity/#comment-3105</link>
		<dc:creator>Giving Stuff Its Due &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=1291#comment-3105</guid>
		<description>[...] E.D. and Mark have excellent posts up debating and discussing the merits of individualism versus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] E.D. and Mark have excellent posts up debating and discussing the merits of individualism versus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Community of Individuals &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/redefining-prosperity/#comment-2950</link>
		<dc:creator>A Community of Individuals &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=1291#comment-2950</guid>
		<description>[...] Emerson in that same essay expresses a sentiment that seems like it could have come directly from one of E.D.&#8217;s attacks on individualism, globalization, and free trade: As our Religion, our Education, our Art look abroad, so does our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Emerson in that same essay expresses a sentiment that seems like it could have come directly from one of E.D.&#8217;s attacks on individualism, globalization, and free trade: As our Religion, our Education, our Art look abroad, so does our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on Why I&#8217;m not a Libertarian — Or, When Belief in &#8220;the Market&#8221; is just risible, sad, and disgusting &#171; Nathancontramundi</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/redefining-prosperity/#comment-2864</link>
		<dc:creator>More on Why I&#8217;m not a Libertarian — Or, When Belief in &#8220;the Market&#8221; is just risible, sad, and disgusting &#171; Nathancontramundi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=1291#comment-2864</guid>
		<description>[...] However, the libertarian counter-argument, which, I confess, immediately flashed through my mind whilst I waited to move ahead in traffic, is equally absurd, to wit, that the market — properly unencumbered, of course — is the check on &#8220;mortgages and other financial products deemed unsafe for consumers&#8221; and a whole host of other yucky things. When corporations become as gargantuan as many of those at the center of our current economic perturbations are, they really exist beyond the controls of the market — sometimes because of the intervention of government, sometimes because they&#8217;re just &#8220;too good.&#8221; They&#8217;ve done so well that they outpace competitors to the point that no natural regulation hinders them. At this point, they fall asleep at the wheel, so to speak. Viva Distributism! Long live the small! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, the libertarian counter-argument, which, I confess, immediately flashed through my mind whilst I waited to move ahead in traffic, is equally absurd, to wit, that the market — properly unencumbered, of course — is the check on &#8220;mortgages and other financial products deemed unsafe for consumers&#8221; and a whole host of other yucky things. When corporations become as gargantuan as many of those at the center of our current economic perturbations are, they really exist beyond the controls of the market — sometimes because of the intervention of government, sometimes because they&#8217;re just &#8220;too good.&#8221; They&#8217;ve done so well that they outpace competitors to the point that no natural regulation hinders them. At this point, they fall asleep at the wheel, so to speak. Viva Distributism! Long live the small! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Work, Identity, and Society: Smashing to Grind Stones &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/redefining-prosperity/#comment-2814</link>
		<dc:creator>Work, Identity, and Society: Smashing to Grind Stones &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=1291#comment-2814</guid>
		<description>[...] good work or a satisfying occupation is a key element in a purposeful life. As E.D. mentions in his post on rethinking prosperity, Hard work is good for us.   It can stave off boredom; it keeps us fit and gives us purpose.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] good work or a satisfying occupation is a key element in a purposeful life. As E.D. mentions in his post on rethinking prosperity, Hard work is good for us.   It can stave off boredom; it keeps us fit and gives us purpose.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Reviving Our Sense of Place, Our Priorities of Localism, Agrarianism, and Self-government&#8221;, Part II &#171; Nathancontramundi</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/redefining-prosperity/#comment-2808</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Reviving Our Sense of Place, Our Priorities of Localism, Agrarianism, and Self-government&#8221;, Part II &#171; Nathancontramundi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=1291#comment-2808</guid>
		<description>[...] to return to the task at hand, to wit, replying to E.D. Kain&#8217;s post, I submit that we conservatives must embrace a New Urbanism that not only &#8220;believes in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to return to the task at hand, to wit, replying to E.D. Kain&#8217;s post, I submit that we conservatives must embrace a New Urbanism that not only &#8220;believes in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Reviving Our Sense of Place, Our Priorities of Localism, Agrarianism, and Self-government&#8221;, Part I &#171; Nathancontramundi</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/03/redefining-prosperity/#comment-2807</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Reviving Our Sense of Place, Our Priorities of Localism, Agrarianism, and Self-government&#8221;, Part I &#171; Nathancontramundi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=1291#comment-2807</guid>
		<description>[...] essay, E.D. Kain presents a superb, indeed &#8220;Front Porch Republic-worthy&#8221; piece, &#8220;Redefining Prosperity,&#8221; an essay so ambitious, loaded, and impressive that I&#8217;ll refrain from even attempting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] essay, E.D. Kain presents a superb, indeed &#8220;Front Porch Republic-worthy&#8221; piece, &#8220;Redefining Prosperity,&#8221; an essay so ambitious, loaded, and impressive that I&#8217;ll refrain from even attempting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
