<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: pacifism and the culture wars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/04/pacifism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/04/pacifism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:54:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JohnC</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/04/pacifism/#comment-8217</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2726#comment-8217</guid>
		<description>Mosef,

It is true that popular opinion is not &quot;very, very much in favor of gay rights.&quot;  But it is not true to say that the public is opposed to gay rights just because of referenda on the question of gay marriage.

In fact, while the voters narrowly passed Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, as a California resident I can safely say that our civil union provisions giving legal rights to committed homosexual relationships are widely accepted and utterly uncontroversial these days.  A recent Washington Post/ABC poll even showed that a majority of Americans across the country (57%) support civil unions -- despite the fact that only 42% support gay marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mosef,</p>
<p>It is true that popular opinion is not &#8220;very, very much in favor of gay rights.&#8221;  But it is not true to say that the public is opposed to gay rights just because of referenda on the question of gay marriage.</p>
<p>In fact, while the voters narrowly passed Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, as a California resident I can safely say that our civil union provisions giving legal rights to committed homosexual relationships are widely accepted and utterly uncontroversial these days.  A recent Washington Post/ABC poll even showed that a majority of Americans across the country (57%) support civil unions &#8212; despite the fact that only 42% support gay marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Tiller &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/04/pacifism/#comment-8214</link>
		<dc:creator>George Tiller &#124; The League of Ordinary Gentlemen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2726#comment-8214</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote a while ago that I am a professed culture war pacifist.  As the years have gone by and I&#8217;ve grown older and (a little bit) wiser, I&#8217;ve also [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote a while ago that I am a professed culture war pacifist.  As the years have gone by and I&#8217;ve grown older and (a little bit) wiser, I&#8217;ve also [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mosef</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/04/pacifism/#comment-8166</link>
		<dc:creator>Mosef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 18:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2726#comment-8166</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m definitely NOT a cultural fanatic, but I am a fact fanatic.  Actually the statement &quot;popular opinion is very, very much in favor of gay rights&quot; is not true.  You can look up the various state votes on gay-marriage yourself, but it has an abysmal record when actually put to, you know, the voice of the people.  Even in California (!), even in 2008, voters rejected gay marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m definitely NOT a cultural fanatic, but I am a fact fanatic.  Actually the statement &#8220;popular opinion is very, very much in favor of gay rights&#8221; is not true.  You can look up the various state votes on gay-marriage yourself, but it has an abysmal record when actually put to, you know, the voice of the people.  Even in California (!), even in 2008, voters rejected gay marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cascadian</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/04/pacifism/#comment-4762</link>
		<dc:creator>Cascadian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2726#comment-4762</guid>
		<description>Defining when a fetus becomes a child is hard.  Defining when a fetus is sustainable is easy.  If these cells are a person then let the State take care of them.  If they can&#039;t survive outside of the womb, then they haven&#039;t really achieved person-hood yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defining when a fetus becomes a child is hard.  Defining when a fetus is sustainable is easy.  If these cells are a person then let the State take care of them.  If they can&#8217;t survive outside of the womb, then they haven&#8217;t really achieved person-hood yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaybird</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/04/pacifism/#comment-4755</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaybird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2726#comment-4755</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s exceptionally uncharitable.

Seriously, if I posted &quot;shorter Barbera: The left and right have to come together so they can form a unified front to allow human beings to be trated as property&quot;, surely that wouldn&#039;t be a fair assessment of your viewpoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exceptionally uncharitable.</p>
<p>Seriously, if I posted &#8220;shorter Barbera: The left and right have to come together so they can form a unified front to allow human beings to be trated as property&#8221;, surely that wouldn&#8217;t be a fair assessment of your viewpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/04/pacifism/#comment-4754</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2726#comment-4754</guid>
		<description>Shorter ccassin:  The left and right have to come together so they can form a unified front to force women to give birth against their will, but they do have to be nice about it.  As a leftist with three children, I am pretty sure I understand the real life consequences of pregnancy.   That&#039;s why I&#039;m pro-choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shorter ccassin:  The left and right have to come together so they can form a unified front to force women to give birth against their will, but they do have to be nice about it.  As a leftist with three children, I am pretty sure I understand the real life consequences of pregnancy.   That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m pro-choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ccassin</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/04/pacifism/#comment-4719</link>
		<dc:creator>ccassin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2726#comment-4719</guid>
		<description>We should all agree that it will never be possible to define exactly when a fetus becomes a self actualizing organism.     Asking politicians to do so is just dumb.     Nor will it ever be possible through cultural mandate to stop sex that leads to unwanted pregnancies.   Nor will it ever be possible to stop women from having abortions - either legal or in the back alleys.

The right following a cultural campaign equivalent to &quot;Just say no&quot; looks ridiculous.   The left standing on the ground of  choice ignores the fact that at some point - which will never be known - the fetus is a baby.

What we are left with then is to either:
1.  fully support a woman who has conceived, but mandate that she carries it to term.
2.  allow her to terminate if the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest.

The left and the right have to come together in some meaningful and compassionate way.   The left accepting that there are real life consequences to pregnancy.   The right taking a compassionate stance to the mother instead of being seen to continually attack women&#039;s rights.

The left&#039;s arguments will melt away as soon as the right focuses on women&#039;s health and natal care, instead of taking what is perceived to be playing cultural war games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should all agree that it will never be possible to define exactly when a fetus becomes a self actualizing organism.     Asking politicians to do so is just dumb.     Nor will it ever be possible through cultural mandate to stop sex that leads to unwanted pregnancies.   Nor will it ever be possible to stop women from having abortions &#8211; either legal or in the back alleys.</p>
<p>The right following a cultural campaign equivalent to &#8220;Just say no&#8221; looks ridiculous.   The left standing on the ground of  choice ignores the fact that at some point &#8211; which will never be known &#8211; the fetus is a baby.</p>
<p>What we are left with then is to either:<br />
1.  fully support a woman who has conceived, but mandate that she carries it to term.<br />
2.  allow her to terminate if the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest.</p>
<p>The left and the right have to come together in some meaningful and compassionate way.   The left accepting that there are real life consequences to pregnancy.   The right taking a compassionate stance to the mother instead of being seen to continually attack women&#8217;s rights.</p>
<p>The left&#8217;s arguments will melt away as soon as the right focuses on women&#8217;s health and natal care, instead of taking what is perceived to be playing cultural war games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matoko_chan</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/04/pacifism/#comment-4702</link>
		<dc:creator>matoko_chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2726#comment-4702</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think people on the other side are evil.....I just think they are stupid.
Read a fucking book on biology for cripes sakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think people on the other side are evil&#8230;..I just think they are stupid.<br />
Read a fucking book on biology for cripes sakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.D. Kain</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/04/pacifism/#comment-4694</link>
		<dc:creator>E.D. Kain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2726#comment-4694</guid>
		<description>Marcell0 - thanks, great point, and another reason why I say the argument coming from the pro-choice side of the aisle that this is &quot;all about sex&quot; is little more than a demonization of what they view as a movement made up entirely of puritanical moralists, when in fact there are indeed many arguments to be made against abortion that are completely divorced from any notion of religion, and stem more from philosophy and/or biology.

For me this is an issue of life and of rights - and as you say, violence and sentience etc.  This is a moral issue to me that is far more important than sexual ones, which is one reason you see me pushing for marriage equality.  I do think monogamy is important, but it is nowhere near as important as the question of abortion; I do think that a sexually disciplined society is best, for men and women and children alike, but that is not the motivation behind my beliefs on the question of abortion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcell0 &#8211; thanks, great point, and another reason why I say the argument coming from the pro-choice side of the aisle that this is &#8220;all about sex&#8221; is little more than a demonization of what they view as a movement made up entirely of puritanical moralists, when in fact there are indeed many arguments to be made against abortion that are completely divorced from any notion of religion, and stem more from philosophy and/or biology.</p>
<p>For me this is an issue of life and of rights &#8211; and as you say, violence and sentience etc.  This is a moral issue to me that is far more important than sexual ones, which is one reason you see me pushing for marriage equality.  I do think monogamy is important, but it is nowhere near as important as the question of abortion; I do think that a sexually disciplined society is best, for men and women and children alike, but that is not the motivation behind my beliefs on the question of abortion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcello</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/04/pacifism/#comment-4692</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=2726#comment-4692</guid>
		<description>Even apart from my commitment and feelings toward my guy, as a gay man in the age of AIDS I think monogamy is the luckiest thing that ever happened to me.  

On the abortion issue: why are Americans so stuck on controlling sex as the motivation for being against abortion?  In this whole discussion I don&#039;t see the non-violence argument.  After a certain point the fetus has brain waves and with that starts to have personhood and therefore rights.. when it is just tissue it doesn&#039;t have rights, but when it can move and react it&#039;s another reality.  In fact the law in many European countries forbids aborting the fetus AFTER 10 or 12 weeks because it is developed enough to be considered a baby

Not just in religions but in most philosophical traditions and ethical systems and even at the level of pure intuition,  killing sentient beings is a bad thing, to be avoided unless absolutely necessary (self defense, saving a life).  The more it is sentient the more it has to be considered</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even apart from my commitment and feelings toward my guy, as a gay man in the age of AIDS I think monogamy is the luckiest thing that ever happened to me.  </p>
<p>On the abortion issue: why are Americans so stuck on controlling sex as the motivation for being against abortion?  In this whole discussion I don&#8217;t see the non-violence argument.  After a certain point the fetus has brain waves and with that starts to have personhood and therefore rights.. when it is just tissue it doesn&#8217;t have rights, but when it can move and react it&#8217;s another reality.  In fact the law in many European countries forbids aborting the fetus AFTER 10 or 12 weeks because it is developed enough to be considered a baby</p>
<p>Not just in religions but in most philosophical traditions and ethical systems and even at the level of pure intuition,  killing sentient beings is a bad thing, to be avoided unless absolutely necessary (self defense, saving a life).  The more it is sentient the more it has to be considered</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
