<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lou Dobbs, friend of the Latinos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/11/lou-dobbs-friend-of-the-latinos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/11/lou-dobbs-friend-of-the-latinos/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/11/lou-dobbs-friend-of-the-latinos/#comment-32217</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/?p=11325#comment-32217</guid>
		<description>You know a fair amount of the anger directed at Lou Dobbs really is a response to what they &lt;i&gt;think &lt;/i&gt; he&#039;s saying and not his actual positions. 

Without weighing in on Dobbs&#039; character, appropriateness, or penchant for pin stripes, there is an instructive lesson to be learned about how America&#039;s legacy of ethnic hatred has made discussing race or ethnicity a veritable minefield, which makes it very hard for us to talk about identity-related issues in the context of a broader political community, when discussing various groups, of which we&#039;re not a part.

The only avenue really open is the trial lawyer approach. If you&#039;re not part of a group the only safe comment one can really make is, &quot;you&#039;ve been wronged and/or I want you to get something for it.&quot; Somewhat ironically, I felt this was Dobbs&#039; approach towards the ever-so-victimized American middle class.

I think Dobbs is largely responsible for his own image in this regard but I&#039;m not sure his leaving CNN is anything more than a palliative Zozobra. To some degree, that we don&#039;t have someone talking about immigration issues outside of a campaign seems like a step towards &lt;strike&gt;not&lt;/strike&gt; dealing with race through omission or a ten-foot pole and calling it progress or postracial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know a fair amount of the anger directed at Lou Dobbs really is a response to what they <i>think </i> he&#8217;s saying and not his actual positions. </p>
<p>Without weighing in on Dobbs&#8217; character, appropriateness, or penchant for pin stripes, there is an instructive lesson to be learned about how America&#8217;s legacy of ethnic hatred has made discussing race or ethnicity a veritable minefield, which makes it very hard for us to talk about identity-related issues in the context of a broader political community, when discussing various groups, of which we&#8217;re not a part.</p>
<p>The only avenue really open is the trial lawyer approach. If you&#8217;re not part of a group the only safe comment one can really make is, &#8220;you&#8217;ve been wronged and/or I want you to get something for it.&#8221; Somewhat ironically, I felt this was Dobbs&#8217; approach towards the ever-so-victimized American middle class.</p>
<p>I think Dobbs is largely responsible for his own image in this regard but I&#8217;m not sure his leaving CNN is anything more than a palliative Zozobra. To some degree, that we don&#8217;t have someone talking about immigration issues outside of a campaign seems like a step towards <strike>not</strike> dealing with race through omission or a ten-foot pole and calling it progress or postracial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
