Some of the coverage from National Review and The Washington Times really has to be read to be believed. A guy whose career highlights include chaining a pregnant woman to a bed and filing trumped-up charges against a judge is suddenly the victim of “persecution.”
I think what Will is saying is that your past deeds, as well as your current level of power, contribute to the legitimacy of the claims of persecution.
Of course, Arpaio deserves all the shit people can shovel on him, so I couldn’t care less if it amounts to persecution or not. The dude is bad news for civil liberties.
Scott December 17th, 2009 at 8:47 am
Yes, God forbid Arpaio should be tough on criminals. We really don’t want that.
Jaybird December 17th, 2009 at 9:12 am
“Waiter! I ordered an omelet!”
Gold Star for Robot Boy December 17th, 2009 at 9:26 am
Scott, are judges, their aides and their personal attorneys criminals?
Scott December 17th, 2009 at 9:33 am
They can be. Just because you are a judge doesn’t mean you are honest.
Can’t you do any better? I don’t see the need for the DOJ to get involved. I’m sure that DOJ’s involvement is not political at all. I’m sure they will manufacture something if they can’t find anything.
Gold Star for Robot Boy December 17th, 2009 at 10:17 am
*I’m sure they will manufacture something if they can’t find anything.*
12 comments
So you are saying that because of what he has done in the past that he can’t be persecuted? What kind of logic is that?
E.D. Kain
December 17th, 2009 at 8:40 am
I think what Will is saying is that your past deeds, as well as your current level of power, contribute to the legitimacy of the claims of persecution.
Of course, Arpaio deserves all the shit people can shovel on him, so I couldn’t care less if it amounts to persecution or not. The dude is bad news for civil liberties.
Scott
December 17th, 2009 at 8:47 am
Yes, God forbid Arpaio should be tough on criminals. We really don’t want that.
Jaybird
December 17th, 2009 at 9:12 am
“Waiter! I ordered an omelet!”
Gold Star for Robot Boy
December 17th, 2009 at 9:26 am
Scott, are judges, their aides and their personal attorneys criminals?
Scott
December 17th, 2009 at 9:33 am
They can be. Just because you are a judge doesn’t mean you are honest.
Jaybird
December 17th, 2009 at 9:34 am
How about Sheriffs?
Scott
December 17th, 2009 at 9:39 am
Sheriffs can be criminals as well.
E.D. Kain
December 17th, 2009 at 9:59 am
Quit persecuting Arpaio, Scott.
Scott
December 17th, 2009 at 10:09 am
Can’t you do any better? I don’t see the need for the DOJ to get involved. I’m sure that DOJ’s involvement is not political at all. I’m sure they will manufacture something if they can’t find anything.
Gold Star for Robot Boy
December 17th, 2009 at 10:17 am
*I’m sure they will manufacture something if they can’t find anything.*
Just like Sheriff Joe.