I’ve mentioned this elsewhere, but Prince Charles’ nascent crunchy conservatism strikes me as emblematic of that movement’s worst features, from the vague noises about “harmony” and “natural order” to a near-total cluelessness about the lives of regular people.
*sigh* Chuck’s never been the sharpest fork in the drawer. My paternal Grandmother (a staunch Canadian Royalist) kept a photo of the Queen on her writing desk. When I asked her why once when I was youg she told me it was to remind her to wish the Monarch a hundred more years of prosperous rule whenever she prayed. Now I’m no praying person but I inherited my Grandmothers fondness for dear Queen Bess II. May she live long enough for her Grandson to take the throne if not for another hundred years.
Michael Drew February 5th, 2010 at 7:32 am
She doesn’t have to outlive her son in order for William to be the next sovereign, isn’t that the current understanding?
North February 5th, 2010 at 7:40 am
The rumors swirl but I haven’t heard anything concrete about Charles agreeing to step aside.
5 comments
*sigh* Chuck’s never been the sharpest fork in the drawer. My paternal Grandmother (a staunch Canadian Royalist) kept a photo of the Queen on her writing desk. When I asked her why once when I was youg she told me it was to remind her to wish the Monarch a hundred more years of prosperous rule whenever she prayed. Now I’m no praying person but I inherited my Grandmothers fondness for dear Queen Bess II. May she live long enough for her Grandson to take the throne if not for another hundred years.
Michael Drew
February 5th, 2010 at 7:32 am
She doesn’t have to outlive her son in order for William to be the next sovereign, isn’t that the current understanding?
North
February 5th, 2010 at 7:40 am
The rumors swirl but I haven’t heard anything concrete about Charles agreeing to step aside.
Michael Drew
February 5th, 2010 at 8:12 am
Interesting. I thought it was done.
North
February 5th, 2010 at 10:24 am
From your lips to my agnostic God(ess?)’s ear.