Random header image... Refresh for more!

Padding Your Resume

Sometimes, I think I missed my true calling as a fabulist. TNR posts the hilariously overwrought resume of Adam Wheeler, a guy who literally conned his way into Harvard (and is apparently fluent in Classical Armenian and Old Persian). This brings to mind the tale of Aleksey Vayner, another Ivy League student with an over-active imagination.

May 18, 2010   5 Comments

Does is it pay to attend college?

Maybe – but it helps if you go into science and technology…graphic after the jump… [Read more →]

December 29, 2009   33 Comments

Harvard as Hogwarts?

I’m a few years removed from the college admissions process, but this is a pretty novel selling point.

December 6, 2009   3 Comments

Barack Obama: The College Years

The New York Times digs up an old Obama op-ed from college.

July 6, 2009   Comments Off

Corrugated Degree Factories

Over at the Daily Dish, Lane Wallace bravely defends the liberal arts (from whom, I wonder – colleges’ burgeoning admissions rolls?), arguing that a humanities degree is somehow necessary to grasp ambiguity and encourage creative thinking. I’m skeptical, but this bit really jumped out at me:

In a flash, I grasped the true value of a college degree. It didn’t matter what I majored in. It didn’t even matter all that much what my grades were. What mattered was that I got that rectangular piece of paper that said, “Lane Wallace never has to work in a corrugated cardboard factory again.” A piece of paper that was proof to any potential future employer that I could stick with a project and complete it successfully, even if parts of it weren’t all that much fun. A piece of paper that said I had learned how to process an overload of information, prioritize, sort through it intelligently, and distill all that into a coherent end product … all while coping with stress and deadlines without imploding.

Granted, studying the humanities may help you understand nuance or enhance your capacity for innovative, original thinking. But is attaining a four-year undergraduate degree really an act of grit, determination and hard work? Having survived the ordeal, I don’t doubt that some hard work is involved – who hasn’t pulled an all-nighter or two in college? – but I suspect that the academic strivers are vastly outnumbered by kids coasting through.

I don’t know why this is, though I could point to a few possible explanations. Perhaps college has become too much like an adolescent rite of passage, more akin to your first summer job or your first steady girlfriend than a serious educational endeavor. Or maybe undergraduate coursework is simply too generic or too easy to offer students a real challenge.  On the other hand, perhaps we’re letting too many people in.

I’m reluctant to generalize from my own experience, and having attended a small, good-but-not-great liberal arts institution, I’ve often wondered if things are different at the top of the heap. Are students simply more conscientious at Harvard or Yale or Brown? How hard does the other half study? Signs point to less than you’d think.

This isn’t to say an undergraduate education is completely worthless, or that you won’t get anything out of four (or more) years at a good liberal arts college. But I’m not sure immersing yourself in the humanities is really what the process is about anymore. Even at elite institutions, the real over-achievers are people who get involved in activities that are only marginally related to academic study. And given the circumstances, I’m not sure we need to valorize a liberal arts degree as some sort of unique testament to hard work and innovation, particularly when so many of our best and brightest weren’t all that interested in college in the first place.

May 19, 2009   18 Comments