Random header image... Refresh for more!

Creating a New Establishment

Despite some quibbles with his characterization of the modern Left, I hope Dan Riehl is very much on the right track in arguing that the old movement conservative establishment is no longer capable of holding the Right together, and that the future of the Right lies with the Tea Parties, and in particular with the more libertarian element of the Tea Parties.  [Read more →]

February 22, 2010   6 Comments

Enhanced Interrogation Techniques and Dick Cheney

Dan Riehl kindly took the time to exchange a few emails with me on the resurfaced issue of the CIA’s use of enhanced interrogation techniques and the Bush Administration’s authorization of those techniques. I think visitors will find the back and forth, especially Dan’s adeptness at presenting an alternate perspective than that generally found on this site, makes for pretty interesting reading. [Read more →]

August 26, 2009   27 Comments

You Say Elitist, I Say Potato

I haven’t had a chance to parse through and offer some thoughts on the debate we hosted between Conor Friedersdorf and Dan Riehl, nor the unfortunate fall out that transpired after the exchange. There was a lot going on in that debate and the resulting blow back and so it might be a bit ambitious, even for blogger of my verbose persuasion, to attempt to capture everything in one post.

However, experiences of the morning have brought a particular element of the whole foofaraw back into focus, namely the ways in which cultural cues are both deeply embedded and a priori inform our political discourse in what I take to be unhelpful ways.

The lead in: despite only working at the company wherein my employment currently resides for four and a half months, I have come to be considered management. I wasn’t hired into any kind of management specific role and to this day my job title and description remain ephemeral at best. None the less, walking around this office I am treated with a certain deference (unwarranted in my opinion) because of the perceived position of power I happen to occupy.

From my experience, when you’re management, it is important to demonstrate that no task with which any of your employees might become saddled is too small or too lowly for you to perform, as well. My conception of management, cast as it was in the fires of not-for-profit work, is that you recognize and acknowledge the power differential that tips in your favour, but that you conversely pitch in and participate in getting whatever work needs to get done.

Full stop, period, bottom line.

To that end, today I am wearing jeans, a t-shirt, and boots, both because I have to move the president of the company from an office in one building to and office back in the primary building, and because it happens to be casual Friday and the first day of Stampede here in Calgary. To move all of the items from one office to the next, I am also pushing a cart between the two buildings out in the public, in addition to wearing “moving office” appropriate clothing.

Now, because I look the way that I do and because I’m pushing a cart around, people with whom I’ve been interacting with outside have been treating me qualitatively differently than when I am, say, walking around in a suit and tie, which is my normal garb. Even with an event where jeans and a t-shirt are as ubiquitous as they are during Stampede currently running, there is a noticeable difference to how people approach me.

To the average passerby I am no longer “management”, I have become a physical labourer and they have altered their behaviour patterns towards me in what they take to be the appropriate fashion. It never enters their mind that the criteria by which they determine what behaviour patterns are appropriate are entirely arbitrary, all they know is that we have certain cultural cues about you treat certain classes of people and they are abiding by those cues — rightly or wrongly.

Nothing particularly controversial there.

The point: so it generally seems to go in our political discourse as well, but in the case of cultural cues that enter into our politics we have a few monkey wrenches that create difficulties for our smooth analysis. As pertains to politics and the culture wars, the use of cultural cues because key elements in normative statements of derision about “the other side” and their unfitness for ascendancy to the levers of governance within society.

So it also seems to go with Dan Riehl and Robert Stacy McCain (two examples, go through their respective websites for many other posts on this topic) as pertains to their reactions towards Conor Friedersdorf and the results here I take to be muddy at best.

Now, let’s get all the cards on the table before we move forward. [Read more →]

July 3, 2009   14 Comments

The Great Debate – Redux

So, true to form, there were problems hooking the discussion up via Blog Talk Radio, but Dan, Conor, and I gave Skype another whirl and managed not just to get through over an hour of conversation, but also had a really great and spirited dialogue. [Read more →]

June 15, 2009   28 Comments

Houston, We Have A Problem – UPDATED

Unfortunately, the scheduled discussion between Conor Friedersdorf and Dan Riehl has had to be rescheduled due to irreconcilable technical difficulties. Every time we started to get into the thick of it, one of us would get booted off the conference call. That’ll learn me to ditch a new plan for the tried, tested, and true method to which I’ve become accustomed. [Read more →]

June 9, 2009   2 Comments

Update On Friedersdorf/Riehl Discussion

So, due to time constraints on my end and limitations around integrating BlogTalkRadio and Skype, we’re reverting back to a non-live version of the discussion between Conor Friedersdorf and Dan Riehl on the current state and potential future of American conservatism. We will still incorporate reader questions that we received here and there will be a post with the audio that goes up Tuesday night. If you have follow up questions, you can provide them in the comments and Conor and Dan are, of course, free to respond at their leisure.

June 8, 2009   Comments Off

Calling All Leaguers

So next week we are going to have a skypecast up of Conor Friedersdorf and Dan Riehl discussing/debating their different ideas about the necessary tonic for the future of American conservatism. I’m exploring the possibility of being able to broadcast the discussion live, though I’ve never done such a thing, so if anyone has any experience with broadcasting live on the Internets please drop a comment to this post or fire me an email via the League’s contact page.

The purpose of this post; however, is to solicit questions from you that can be put to Conor and Dan while we have them on the line. So fire away because both Dan and Conor, as well as everyone here at the League, are curious to see what you come up with. As always, keep it clean, civil, on topic, but still interesting and challenging.

Thanks much.

June 2, 2009   37 Comments