Random header image... Refresh for more!

Post-election ruminations

So let’s see – in Virginia a life-long social conservative, Bob McDonnell, ran as a pragmatist and beat the tar out of  Democrat Creigh Deeds.  Exit polls show a majority of Virginians still support President Obama.  In New Jersey, voters were fed up with incumbent Jon Corzine, despite Obama’s best efforts to prop up the incumbent Democrat.  Republican Chris Christie won that race, even though exit polls in that state showed overwhelming approval rates for the President.

And in the much-ballyhooed NY-23 special election, Conservative Party candidate, and self-proclaimed Glenn Beck acolyte, Doug Hoffman was given the smackdown by Democrat Bill Owens.

Now, I would draw from this Democratic victory in a traditionally Republican area – the first Democrat to represent New York’s North Country in over a century – a few observations.

First, what works for conservatives in Texas or Georgia might not work for conservatives in California or New York.  One of the lovely things about conservative philosophy is its emphasis on local politics.  Dede Scozzafada may not have been red enough meat for the likes of Sean Hannity or Michelle Malkin, but she might have been just the right shade for northern New Yorkers.  Doug Hoffman, on the other hand, might have fit in better somewhere else.  Really, it was a northern New York affair.  The national Republican meddling distorted the issues on the ground.  Left alone, Scozzafada may very well have beat Owens, giving the GOP a much-needed seat in the House – even if she wasn’t of purest stock.  Remember, in Virginia, the Republican candidate campaigned on fiscal and economic issues – as a pragmatic leader, not as a red meat social conservative.  And he won.

Second, even a liberal Republican is much more likely to vote with Republicans on issues than a moderate Democrat.  Party loyalty cannot be underestimated here.

So what does the conservative movement take from this loss amidst all this victory? [Read more →]

November 4, 2009   21 Comments

Stray thoughts on the NY-23 race

The cosmic significance of the congressional race in New York’s 23rd district has, I think, been wildly overblown by a conservative movement that seems obsessively focused on extremely narrow tactical issues (Van Jones, anyone?). However, the arguments over party discipline and ideological are pretty interesting and worth commenting on.

My litmus test for a heterodox conservative candidate is twofold. If you’re a genuinely original thinker who encourages intramural debate, chances are you’re better suited for office than some slavish devotee of party orthodoxy. A political movement can’t consist entirely of politicians who buck the party line, but in general, these figures are comparatively rare and worth preserving (think McCain at his maverick-y best).

The second condition has to do with the realities of national coalition-building. If, for example, you’re running in a traditionally liberal district, the logic of moderating your ideological outlook is pretty ironclad.

As best I can tell, however, Dede Scozzafava didn’t fall into either category. However sincere, her breaks with party orthodoxy aren’t going to be remembered as vital contributions to the debate over conservative renewal. And her district, despite its location in the heart of the Northeast, is known far and wide as a conservative stronghold.

I can’t say I’m particularly pleased by her conservative replacement, Doug Hoffman, who seems embarassingly clueless about issues that actually matter to his constituents. But the general principle of electing conservative candidates in conservative districts strikes me as pretty unobjectionable.

November 2, 2009   46 Comments