Random header image... Refresh for more!

hawks and owls

So, lately I’ve been trying to branch out a bit more – to see what the movement conservatives have to say and pay it a little more heed (rather than focusing only on the really silly things) and not just wander about the realms of the dissidents and libertarians and localists (even though these are typically the more serious voices out there, and the only voices which I think promise any real reform agenda, any real possibility of limited government and liberty, and all that jazz).

The thing is, I sometimes begin to feel a little bit too contrarian, or as Kara Hopkins put it a while back: “I snipe much and affect little.”  As easy as it is for the movement types to demonize and excommunicate the dissidents, it is just as easy for the dissidents to do the same.  (Thus my post a while ago on ‘the big tent.’)

But a couple thing keep tripping me up in this quest to expand and broaden my horizons.  A couple not-insignificant obstacles remain between any meaningful alliance of the dissident and movement conservatives.  Probably the most glaring is the hawk and owl divide – or if you prefer, the realist/neocon divide.  You see, to me no true conservatism can embrace the sort of hawkish, militaristic policies that the neoconservatives lay claim to.  These are liberal internationalist policies sprinkled heavily with right-wing machismo.  Conservatives are supposed to be wary of “statism” yet nothing says statist like a security or police state built on the back of the global war on terror overseas contingency operation.  Nothing promises Big Government like a Really Big Military.  (Well, except for maybe Really Big Bailouts and Really Big Entitlements…) [Read more →]

July 29, 2009   10 Comments

The Tyranny of Mark Levin’s Liberty

July 10, 2009   12 Comments